• Blog Stats

    • 451,176 hits
  • Follow MY MIND SNAPS on WordPress.com
  • Walt Shakes

    Walt Shakes

    Walter Ude (@Walt_Shakes) is an award-winning Nigerian writer, poet and veteran blogger. He is a lover of the written word. the faint whiff of nature, the flashing vista of movies, the warmth of companionship and the happy sound of laughter. He blogs at mymindsnaps.wordpress.com.

    Verified Services

    View Full Profile →

  • WHAT CAN WORDS DO (poems)?

    What Can Words Do?

    Buy your copy of Nigeria's best selling collection of poems. Contact 08060109295 or click image to buy on Amazon.

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • It looks like the WordPress site URL is incorrectly configured. Please check it in your widget settings.

  • Advertisements

Only Liars Shall Be Jailed for 7 Years

Culled from Bellanaija.com; Written by Omavuaye Mudiaga-Erhueh

As soon as I saw media reports to the tune of “Senate Proposes 7-Year Jail Term for Social Media Critics,” my first reaction was: “Are you kidding me?!” Several ideas ran through my head, first of which was my right to free speech, opinion, thoughts, etc. all guaranteed by our sacrosanct Nigerian Constitution and several international conventions, to which Nigeria is a signatory, blah blah blah. I put on my lawyer hat and activist armour immediately and was ready to write an article criticising the so-called bill proposed at the Senate.

However, in about two minutes, I took off my armour and hat, sighed in relief and shook my head. Why? After reading the first report I stumbled on, I realised I was a victim of sensational journalism, typical of Nigerian media and surprisingly, BBC Africa. Such reports are misleading and misconceived and should be discouraged.

For the sake of clarity and precision, Section 13 (3) of the Bill apparently proposes that:

Anyone who intentionally propagates false information that could threaten the security of the country or that is capable of inciting the general public against the government through electronic message shall be guilty of an offense and upon conviction shall be sentenced to seven years imprisonment or N5 million (fine)” (underlining supplied).

First, there is no specific mention of ‘social media critics’ – the provision says ‘anyone’ who uses ‘electronic message’. Therefore, you do not have to be on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, etc., before you would qualify to be a potential criminal, if this Bill is passed into law. Sending a simple text message, BBM, Whatsapp message, Skype, etc. would fall under the category of ‘electronic message’. Further, the Nigerian National Assembly would be careful enough not to expressly mention a specific class of people (social media critics) so that the legislation would not be criticised as discriminatory and possibly unconstitutional.

????????????????????????????????????????????????Second, before a person would be found guilty of the proposed offence, s/he must have intentionally propagated false information. This simply means you are a criminal only if the information you have published/shared is FALSE. Technically, this could also cover bloggers and others who publish a ‘fact’ and provide opportunity for people to comment, in circumstances where the comments published are false, and such false comments ‘could threaten the security of the country or [are] capable of inciting the general public against the government.’

The reason the original publishers of the ‘fact’ could be jointly/severally criminally responsible for the false comments of their readers is the potential implication of the use of the word ‘propagate’ as opposed to words like ‘publish’ or ‘share’. ‘Propagation’ has meanings such as ‘to multiply/breed’; ‘to cause to extend to a broader area or larger number’; ‘to make widely known’; ‘to spread and promote (an idea, theory, etc.) widely’, etc. Thus, whoever is in control of the approved threads of comments with false information, which have the effect stated in the legislation, could also be found criminally liable as a result of the propagation, or even under Section 7 of the Criminal Code, even if the initial ‘post’ was true.

Third, it is important to exercise caution – there is a clear difference between critiquing and lying (disseminating false information). This is a clear case of black and white. There is no blur! A critique is a detailed evaluation/analysis and assessment of something. A critique can be done without lying or providing false information. Therefore, if you are a critic (via social media or other electronic means), there is no crime; on the other hand, if you lie and your lie has the potential to threaten the security of the country or is capable of inciting the general public against the government, you SHALL go to jail or pay the fine.

In my opinion, this proposed provision should be welcomed with open arms. This would make everybody cautious of the messages and information they spread via electronic means. In Nigeria, almost every person is an activist, always eager to jump on a bandwagon, even without being adequately educated on the cause being fought. For example, #ChildNotBride campaign – though it was for a good cause – its foundation was grossly misconceived and some influential Nigerians (to my disappointment) openly attacked ‘the proposed law’ to legalise child marriage. E.g. an influential Nigerian ‘spat fire’ in a widely-circulated video after apparently seeing the ‘videos’ and ‘reports’ of such law being proposed. That was false information (as no such law was proposed), capable of inciting the general public against the government. For a contrast and a real critique, see Maryam Uwais’ article. A critic’s opinion can be expressed with passion, drama and zeal absent false information.

Moreover, as a friend rightly pointed out, the crime being proposed is akin to the crime of sedition, which already exists in Nigeria and commands a lesser penalty (about 2/3 years imprisonment). But the law being proposed is specifically with regard to electronic messages, has wider reach and includes false information that could threaten national security.

In a nutshell, the reports being circulated about the proposed law are sensational at best, and have the capacity to mislead the public. The proposed provision applies to any and every person who communicates electronically, not just social media users/critics. Further, if the bill is passed into law, only those who propagate false information may be liable to criminal punishment. An honest critic/commentator/e-messenger has no cause to worry or complain about the proposed law.

The End.

In other words, my people, if I publish ‘fact’ here and you people dare come here to comment lies, I have ‘propagated’ and you have put me in the same wahala with you people. Issorait. Finally, I have just one thing to say about this write-up, these kinds of laws have a way to veering from the clear-cut lines that the writer has outlined into the blurry gray area where anyone and everyone (both innocent and guilty) will fall victims. Like a commenter here once said, and I’m paraphrasing, it is when you get to court that those underlined words in the Bill – Anyone, intentionally propagates false information and electronic message – will take on a set of whole new meanings.

Leave a comment


  1. I totally agree with your post. Especially the final paragraph, for when I read the bill I was convinced that on paper it looked credible but I had 2 reservations.

    1. I believe the Freedom of speech (in a democracy) is almost an inviolable right and i get very very suspicious when the legislators spend time debating and attempting to pass bills like this in our already feeble democracy!

    2. Again as your final paragraph notes, those words underlined (and may I add the phrase ‘national security’) are likely to become slippery as an eel when employed in the law court.Obvious example is the way National Security has been used to justify a number of atrocities in the post 9/11 world e.g. US covert operations of monitoring(or as I like to believe stalking), kidnapping and detaining and transferring of individuals without trials or prospect of trial; during which the Convention on Torture has been broken severally! I fear that this would be the case with such a bill in Nigeria!

    For these reasons, I am extremely suspicious of bills like this!

  2. Stephen

     /  December 6, 2013

    True write up really. Its a welcome idea but some pple need to go back to school to learn d meaning of ‘false information & rumors’ to prevent future of national security.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: